Definition: The margin of appreciation is a doctrine used by the European Court of Human Rights to allow States some flexibility (“a margin”) in how they implement Convention rights. It is linked to subsidiarity — the idea that national authorities have primary responsibility, while Strasbourg supervises compliance.
Why the Court allows a margin
- Europe contains diverse legal systems and social traditions.
- Some rights questions require balancing, context, and local knowledge.
- The Court aims to avoid unnecessary confrontation with domestic institutions.
Where the margin becomes dangerous in family-life cases
In Article 8 (family life) disputes, States often argue: “We should get a wide margin because this is sensitive child policy.” The risk is that “margin” becomes a shield for weak evidence, low procedural safeguards, or irreversible outcomes (like permanent separation) without true necessity.
Key safeguards that limit the margin
- Proportionality: measures must be necessary and the least intrusive option.
- Procedural fairness: serious interferences require robust process and evidence.
- European consensus: where Europe converges, the margin narrows.
- Irreversibility: more severe / irreversible measures tend to require stricter scrutiny.
Do Better Norge perspective
When Norway invokes “child’s best interests” as a near-absolute, the margin of appreciation can quietly expand — and families pay the price. DBN’s approach is to force the argument back to measurable standards: evidence quality, necessity, reunification effort, and proportionality.
Comments (0)
You must be logged in to comment Login
No comments yet. Be the first to start the conversation.